Professor Pope is available to serve as a consulting or testifying expert witness in court, arbitration, or other tribunal proceedings. This page summarizes his experience in five categories:
Areas of Expertise
Experience as Expert Witness
Value of Bioethics Expert Witnesses
Areas of Expertise
Bioethics Brain Death
End-of-Life Medical Treatment
Life Sustaining Treatment Disputes
Medical malpractice liability
Surrogate Decision Making
Experience as Expert Witness
Professor Pope has served as both a consulting and testifying expert witness in court, arbitration, and other tribunal proceedings. Professor Pope has worked with a wide range of parties in the healthcare system. He has been retained by hospital systems, physicians, nurses, and patients. Professor Pope has worked for both plaintiffs and defendants.
Professor Pope has engaged on two main types of cases.
1. First, he has worked on both tort and contract cases involving healthcare providers. These cases often intertwine with issues of clinical and/or professional ethics. For example, a key question in these cases was whether the manner of terminating a hospital-physician contract resulted in patient abandonment.
2. Second, Professor Pope has worked on actions regarding life-sustaining treatment. These cases often concern the scope of consent authority possessed by surrogate decision makers like proxies, agents, parents, and guardians.
A. Testified at Trial
In Areen Charabarti, No. 201800563MI (Orphans Court Division, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania 2018). Professor Pope testified at a May 2018 trial on the legal status of brain death. He testified on behalf of a family who contested the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia diagnosis and treatment plan. He also served as consulting expert for the family.
In re Natalie A. Duke, No. SBC-20-0-30803 (California State Bar filed Nov. 23, 2020). Trial is scheduled for late 2021 in this attorney discipline case where county attorneys challenged a patient's agent and wife from implementing his advance directive. The State Bar took Professor Pope's deposition in April 2021.
B. Testified at Deposition
Ramdas Bhandari, MD v. V/H/A Southwest Community Health Corporation d/b/a Community Hospital Corporation and Artesia General Hospital, No. 1:09-CV-00932 JB/LAM (U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico 2010-2011). Professor Pope was retained by Greenberg Traurig LLP for a hospital client. The primary issue concerned hospital and physician duties to the former patients of a departing physician. The plaintiff took Professor Pope’s deposition in Houston.
Wagner v. Summa Health System, No. CV-2013-09-4227 (Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Ohio 2016-2017). Professor Pope was retained by the family of a deceased patient. The primary issue concerned provider duties to obtain appropriate consent for a DNR/CCO order. The defendant took Professor Pope’s deposition in Saint Paul.
Cedar Valley Medical Specialists v. Singh & Kamenova,
No. LACV 131470 (Black Hawk County District Court Iowa 2018). Professor Pope was retained by two oncologists. Their former employer charged that the manner of their contract termination and departure constituted patient abandonment. The defendant took Professor Pope's deposition in Saint Paul in December 2018.
Potts v. San Rafael Operating Company, No. SCV-266808 (Sonoma County Superior Court, Cal. 2021). Professor Pope is consulting with a law firm hired by the family of a patient whose nursing home provided treatment contrary to the patient's advance directive and agent's directions.
Michael Hickson v. St. David's South Austin Medical Center & Family Eldercare (2020). Professor Pope consulted with a law firm hired by the family of a patient whose life-sustaining treatment was withdrawn contrary to his wishes and on the basis of his pre-existing disabilities.
In re B.A.B, No. 68-0904-34484 (Minnesota Office of Admin. Hearings 2018). Professor Pope was retained by Fredrikson & Byron on behalf of a nurse client. This healthcare licensing board action involves professional boundaries. It questions whether the licensee should have accepted a significant gift from a patient long after the treatment relationship had ended. Professor Pope prepared a report but did not testify.
Guardianship of Lisa Spangler, No. BE15PO724GD (Massachusetts Probate & Family Court, Berkshire Division 2018). The family of a disabled individual retained Professor Pope in a matter that questioned whether a guardian may direct a healthcare facility to withdraw a patient’s artificial nutrition and hydration. The patient died before Professor Pope was required to testify.
Kosta M. Arget, MD et al. v. Renown Health et al., No. CV11-02477 (Second Judicial District for the State of Nevada, Washoe County 2013). Professor Pope was retained by Bryan Cave LLP for a hospital client. The primary issue concerned hospital and physician group duties to former patients of departing physicians. Professor Pope attended a key hearing in Reno, but the case settled before his testimony was needed.
In re Rodney Knoepfle (Helena, Montana 2016-2017). Professor Pope worked as a pre-suit non-testifying expert for a patient planning claims against a hospital. Clinicians had resuscitated the patient against his wishes and directions. The case settled for $400,000.
$300 per hour for research, document review, and preparation
$400 per hour for deposition and trial testimony
Professor Pope has been a member of the State Bar of California since 1999.
Professor Pope was admitted pro hac vice to New Jersey in 2009 and 2010.
Professor Pope is nationally certified as a healthcare ethics consultant (HEC-C) through 2025.
Value of Bioethics Expert Testimony
George G. Agich & Bethany J. Spielman, Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics, 22(4) JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PHILOSOPHY 381-403 (1997).
Jocelyn Downie, Health Care Ethics Experts in Canadian Courts, 9(3) HEALTH LAW REVIEW 19-26 (2001).
John C. Fletcher, Bioethics in a Legal Forum: Confessions of an Expert Witness, 22(4) JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PHILOSOPHY 297-324 (1997).
Kenneth Kipnis, Confessions of an Expert Ethics Witness, 22(4) JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PHILOSOPHY 325-343 (1997).
Kenneth Kipnis, Ethics Expertise in Civil Litigation, 33(2) JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 274-278 (2005).
Stephen R. Latham, Expert Bioethics Testimony, 33(2) JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 242-247 (2005).
Taiwo A. Oriola, The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom, 6 JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE & LAW (2006).
John J. Paris, Expert Testimony by a Bioethicist: Perspectives and Practice, 26 CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS 469-475 (2017).
Bethany Spielman & George Agich, The Future of Bioethics Testimony: Guidelines for Determining Qualifications, Reliability, and Helpfulness, 36 SAN DIEGO LAW REVIEW 1043 (1999).
BETHANY J. SPIELMAN, BIOETHICS IN LAW 121-174 (Humana Press 2007).