Professor Pope is available to serve as a consulting or testifying expert witness in court, arbitration and other tribunal proceedings.
Areas of Expertise
Bioethics Brain Death
End-of-Life Medical Treatment
Life Sustaining Treatment Disputes
Surrogate Decision Making
Experience as Expert Witness
Professor Pope has served as both a consulting and testifying expert witness in court, arbitration, and other tribunal proceedings. Professor Pope has worked with a wide range of parties in the healthcare system. He has been retained by hospital systems, physicians, nurses, and patients. Professor Pope has worked for both plaintiffs and defendants.
Professor Pope has engaged on two main types of cases. First, he has worked on both tort and contract cases involving healthcare providers. These cases often intertwine with issues of clinical and/or professional ethics. For example, a key question in these cases was whether the manner of terminating a hospital-physician contract resulted in patient abandonment. Second, Professor Pope has worked on actions regarding life-sustaining treatment. These cases often concern the scope of consent authority possessed by surrogate decision makers like proxies, agents, parents, and guardians.
A. Testified at Trial
In Areen Charabarti, No. 201800563MI (Orphans Court Division, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania 2018). Professor Pope testified at a May 2018 trial on the legal status of brain death. He testified on behalf of a family dispute who contested the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia diagnosis and treatment plan. He also served as consulting expert for the family.
B. Testified at Deposition
Ramdas Bhandari, MD v. V/H/A Southwest Community Health Corporation d/b/a Community Hospital Corporation and Artesia General Hospital, No. 1:09-CV-00932 JB/LAM (U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico 2010-2011). Professor Pope was retained by Greenberg Traurig LLP for a hospital client. The primary issue concerned hospital and physician duties to the former patients of a departing physician. The plaintiff took Professor Pope’s deposition in Houston.
Wagner v. Summa Health System, No. CV-2013-09-4227 (Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Ohio 2016-2017). Professor Pope was retained by the family of a deceased patient. The primary issue concerned provider duties to obtain appropriate consent for a DNR/CCO order. The defendant took Professor Pope’s deposition in Saint Paul.
Cedar Valley Medical Specialists v. Singh & Kamenova, No. LACV 131470 (Black Hawk County District Court Iowa 2018). Professor Pope was retained by two oncologists. Their former employer charges that the manner of their contract termination and departure constituted patient abandonment.
In re B.A.B, No. 68-0904-34484 (Minnesota Office of Admin. Hearings 2018). Professor Pope was retained by Fredrikson & Byron on behalf of a nurse client. This healthcare licensing board action involves professional boundaries. It questions whether a licensee should have accepted a significant gift from a patient long after the treatment relationship had ended. Professor Pope prepared a report but has not yet testified.
Guardianship of Lisa Spangler, No. BE15PO724GD (Massachusetts Probate & Family Court, Berkshire Division 2018). The family of a disabled individual retained Professor Pope in a matter that questioned whether a guardian may direct a healthcare facility to withdraw a patient’s artificial nutrition and hydration. The patient died before Professor Pope was required to testify.
Kosta M. Arget, MD et al. v. Renown Health et al., No. CV11-02477 (Second Judicial District for the State of Nevada, Washoe County 2013). Professor Pope was retained by Bryan Cave LLP for a hospital client. The primary issue concerned hospital and physician group duties to former patients of departing physicians. Professor Pope attended a hearing in Reno, but the case settled before his testimony was needed.
In re Rodney Knoepfle (Helena, Montana 2016-2017). Professor Pope worked as a pre-suit non-testifying expert for a patient planning claims against a hospital. Clinicians had resuscitated the patient against his wishes and directions.
$300 per hour for research, document review, and preparation
$400 per hour for deposition and trial testimony
Professor Pope has been a member of the State Bar of California since 1999.
Professor Pope was admitted pro hac vice to New Jersey in 2009 and 2010.
Value of Bioethics Expert Testimony
Goerge G. Agich & Bethany J. Spielman, Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics, 22(4) JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PHILOSOPHY 381-403 (1997).
Jocelyn Downie, Health Care Ethics Experts in Canadian Courts, 9(3) HEALTH LAW REVIEW 19-26 (2001).
John C. Fletcher, Bioethics in a Legal Forum: Confessions of an Expert Witness, 22(4) JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PHILOSOPHY 297-324 (1997).
Kenneth Kipnis, Confessions of an Expert Ethics Witness, 22(4) JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PHILOSOPHY 325-343 (1997).
Kenneth Kipnis, Ethics Expertise in Civil Litigation, 33(2) JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 274-278 (2005).
Stephen R. Latham, Expert Bioethics Testimony, 33(2) JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 242-247 (2005).
Taiwo A. Oriola, The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom, 6 JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE & LAW (2006).
John J. Paris, Expert Testimony by a Bioethicist: Perspectives and Practice, 26 CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS 469-475 (2017).
Bethany Spielman & George Agich, The Future of Bioethics Testimony: Guidelines for Determining Qualifications, Reliability, and Helpfulness, 36 SAN DIEGO LAW REVIEW 1043 (1999).
BETHANY J. SPIELMAN, BIOETHICS IN LAW 121-174 (Humana Press 2007).